Welcome to our new website – explore our projects, news and member resources.
Skip to content

Optimising crop nutrition in canola

Evaluating the relationship between nitrogen levels in soil and sulphur uptake in canola.

This project was completed in 2018.

Project Officer
Dr Cassandra Schefe

WHY THIS PROJECT WAS IMPORTANT

The project was designed in response to farmers in southern NSW who were questioning the accepted requirements of in-season sulphur (S) in canola.

Traditionally, up to 20-24kg S/ha is applied prior to, or onto a canola crop. However, given canola-wheat is now a key cropping rotation and many paddocks have good history of sulphur application, and there is also evidence of sulphur accumulation at depth, growers have been questioning if that amount is actually required for each canola crop.

In short: This project addressed grower concerns about sulphur requirements in canola in southern NSW. Field trials at Howlong and Yarrawonga in 2017 and Howlong and Coreen in 2018 aimed to evaluate nitrogen-sulphur interactions and provide an economic analysis of the crops response. 

Project focus

As part of the project, two field trials were conducted at Howlong and Yarrawonga during 2017 and at Howlong and Coreen during 2018. The trials aimed to generate local information about the interactions between nitrogen supply and sulphur uptake, to ensure sulphur uptake is not inhibited by sub-optimal nitrogen levels. and to provide an economic analysis of the response.

Replicated trials were sown at Howlong and Coreen during 2018, involving different combinations of nitrogen and sulphur treatments. The sulphur treatments were: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 kg S/ha (applied as ammonium sulphate, while nitrogen was applied at 0, 40, 80, 160 or 240 kg N/ha (as urea).

Soil sampling, dry matter (DM) sampling, tissue analysis, NDVI and harvest yield data was collected for plots at, enabling gross margin analysis to be undertaken for both 2017 and 2018. 

Project outcomes

Key outcomes from the 2018 trials were:

  • The Coreen trial was not harvested due to dry conditions
  • While harvest results at Howlong were compromised due to dry conditions, early dry matter and tissue nitrogen and sulphur results indicate an interaction between nitrogen and sulphur
  • While early DM production increased with added nitrogen, there was a trend for further early biomass production when sulphur was also added
  • As tissue nitrogen concentrations increased, sulphur concentrations also increased, as measured at harvest
  • There were no differences in yield due to applied nitrogen or sulphur treatments, likely due to the dry conditions
  • Protein levels increased with added nitrogen, while oil levels decreased.

Two years of trial results from this project were published in Research for the Riverine Plains, 2019. Please note that the 2019 report contains an amendment to the data and analyses in the report previously published in Research for the Riverine Plains, 2018.

Find out more

For further information on this project, please email Riverine Plains Senior Project Manager Jane McInnes at jane@riverineplains.org.au

Project investment

This project was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC).

Focus areas

Share

MORE ON Grains & Soils

Our research enhances food production, increases environmental resilience and improves community connection across the Riverine Plains. See how our research creates impact.

JOIN RIVERINE PLAINS

Riverine Plains provides opportunities to see new research and innovation, connect with rural communities, and attend informative events.

The Russell Family
“Riverine Plains is the authority on farming systems and farmer-driven research that directly feeds back to our business. We've had continuous benefits from the research extension, publications, and updates.”
Andrew & Sue Russell, Lilliput Ag
Riverine Plains members